Posts Tagged 'Garden State'

A Breathtaking, Tangible Masterpiece – the Black Swan review

“I just want to be perfect” says Natalie Portman’s prima ballerina Nina Sayers when company director Thomas (Vincent Cassel) urges her to let go and live and discover the black swan inside of her. He is convinced that she can do the innocent, perfect white swan, but the leading role in Swan’s Lake demands more from Nina.

“Their names were Tom and Jerry and I fucked them both.” The premiere of the ballet is nearing and it becomes clear that Nina has transformed, or is transforming. But whether this is a good thing…. She throws out her stuffed animals and the music box with the twirling ballerina figure on top. She locks out her over-protective mother from her room and indulges in sex, drugs and rock’n’roll with alter ego and rival Lily (Mila Kunis, from the That 70s Show).

The question is if Nina will really be able to pull of the black swan, the aggressive and seductive mirror image of the white swan. And if so, at what cost? Director Darren Aronofsky has made a true masterpiece out of Black Swan. Aronofsky, a controversial love-it-or-hate-it figure seems to have finally won over not only the critics that favored him already, but also the big film going audience. His previous work was marginal (Pi), excessive (Requiem for a Dream), misunderstood (The Fountain) and finally overlooked with The Wrestler, which gained respect because of its leading man (Mickey Rourke) rather than its director. But while (some of the) critics who did not appreciate Aronofsky’s work in the first place remain unconvinced, the master of psycho-horror has finally managed to produce a box office success Stateside.

With a hand-held camera that is often too-close-for-comfort to the characters, suggestive lighting, a thunderous reimagining of Tchaikovsky’s music by Clint Mansell and a breathtaking new choreography of the famous ballet Nina Sayers’ descend into madness and self-mutilation turns visceral and even tangible to the audience. Her strive for perfection, the pressures endured on behalf of Thomas, Lily and her mother and the discipline that Nina maintains with regard to her body are literally felt. The film leaves the viewer physically tired and overwhelmed. And delighted with joy and admiration.

And how wonderful has Natalie Portman grown up. From a wunderkind in Leon to a spunky youngster in Garden State and passed a political coming-of-age in V for Vendetta she is know with right one of Hollywood’s leading ladies. And when she grabs that well-deserved Oscar for Black Swan she will be there with the likes of Streep, Roberts and Kidman; the true – deserved – divas of American cinema. That her career survived the agony of the Star Wars prequels, unlike those of Ewan McGregor and Hayden Christensen, is just another diamond to her crown. In Black Swan Portman goes all the way. She transformed physically into a dancer (losing 10 kilos and learning to do the ballet scenes herself) and puts her character through the murkiest depths of psychological horror and disintegration. Only to transform into something even more beautiful than the white swan and transcend all darkness in the end.

Black Swan is one of the top movies of the year, deservedly nominated for 5 Oscars. And although Best Film might be out of reach with the competition of the likes of The Social Network, True Grit and The King’s Speech, and although Inception might pick up Best Cinematography, Natalie Portman is a shoe-in for Best Actress, Aronofsky has a shot for Best Director, and the ballet sequences deserve an award for Best Editing. Whether the Academy agrees is to be seen, but American audiences loved the film, I loved the film and I hope many of you will too.

Stop Casting Ridiculously Good Looking People as Regular Joe’s Part Two

In a post last week I voiced my anger over the depiction of women in popular cinema in general and in the films 4.3.2.1 and Transformers in particular. My central argument was that it may be fine to have Ridiculously Good Looking Women casted as princesses, femmes fatales, super heroines and so on, but that ‘normal’ characters should be played by women who are made to look ‘normal’. This does not mean that they should not be beautiful – I also argued against the uglification of Nicole Kidman for The Hours and Charlize Theron for Monster – but that they have slightly acceptable dress sizes, wear a decent amount of clothing and do not wear make-up as if it were war paint. A very specific point considered the casting of Megan Fox as a teenager, and the way her body was framed by Michael Bay.

That was all fine and nice, and I got some friendly comments, and it was definitely all very PC and such, and it boosted my site statistics enormously, but afterwards I felt something nagging. I had only written about the depiction of women, whereas my title was: Stop Casting Ridiculously Good Looking People as Regular Joe’s. Most Joe’s are men.

It is probably very PC to fulminate against a pornographic and voyeuristic sensibility concerning the depiction of women in film, but it is also rather easy for me. Very safe. I said that the depiction of normal women in 4.3.2.1 contributes to insecurity about looks amongst young teenage girls. What I should have said is that the casting of Ridiculously Good Looking Men as normal characters contributes to insecurities amongst young men.

Seriously. Normal young men do not look like Robert Pattinson. Otherwise they (we I mean) would be in film and on television. I won’t go so far as to say they boy can’t act (I have not seen enough R-Patz movies to make such statements) but if he looked like me he would not have been in Twilight.

So should actors be ugly and should R-Patz not be in any movie because it makes me insecure about myself? Of course not. He can be a sparkling immortal vampire. Or a super hero. Or a fighter pilot. Or a prince. But why would he be a normal kid from a normal (be it somewhat overloaded on emotional baggage) family. What is the point of casting him in Remember Me as a regular Joe who develops a normal relationship to a normal girl in his problem-stricken-but-still-painstakingly-plain-and-bourgeois life? What does it add? What does it say? What expectations does it raise amongst his creepily obsessed female fans? Wake up gals, if R-Patz is your ideal and your standard, we’ll never be able to deliver.

The other extreme is of course those infantile ‘comedies’ like Superbad and ‘Knocked Up’, in which young men are so terribly obnoxious and ugly and nerdy and misogynistic that you can only look down on them, rather then sympathize or empathize with them.

Good examples, the principles of which should be followed by casting directors, screenwriters producers and directors world wide are: Michael Cera in Juno, Aaron Johnson in Kick-Ass and Zach Braff in Garden State. They are quirky, nerdy, weird at times, but very normal in every other respect. Cera is a bit of an idiot in Juno, but also a loving boyfriend. He is neither very handsome nor very nerdy. Johnson is a teenager ‘practically invisible to girls’, who can only come in contact with his dream girl by pretending he is gay. BUT WITHOUT ANY STEREOTYPING! Zach Braff is actually able to charm and pick up a girl and face his standard twenty-something problems without staring moodily in the camera or revealing a six pack. I look at Garden State, a film that is supposed to make me happy, and it works. Because the guy is like me, and I am happy for him when he gets the girl, and I am happy for me, because I can do that too!

Of course, my point has been made previously. Much better and more eloquent. By South Park, of course.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.